Given that you haven’t had very much exposure to chemical formulas, other than the ones you’ve read on the back of your shampoo bottle or seen in a pharmaceutical commercial, which of the following formulas seems the most plausible? In other words, which one seems most likely to be a real chemical compound?
CCl2F2
CCl1.21F3.42

You probably answered the first one, simply because of all the compounds you know (think of water or carbon dioxide), none of them have decimal values as subscripts. Why not? Because elements cannot be subdivided smaller than individual atoms. It is of course possible to subdivide atoms of course, they can be divided into protons, neutrons, electrons, and even smaller particles. However, upon doing so, they lose their identity as particular elements. The reason you would never see the formula CCl1.21F3.42 is because it there is no such thing as 0.21 of a chlorine atom or 0.42 of a fluorine atom.
This simple idea is expressed in a somewhat more complicated way in the Law of Multiple Proportions. The Law of Multiple Proportions states that when two elements combine with each other to form different compounds, the masses of one element that combine with a fixed mass of the second element can be expressed as small, whole number ratios.
That’s a mouthful. It is best understood by looking at an example.


Sample | % P | %Cl | Ratio of Cl to P |
PCl3 | 22.6 | 77.4 | 3.42 |
PCl5 | 14.9 | 85.1 | 5.71 |